0000001568 00000 n 0000006193 00000 n Decision Summary. If an author believes the decision regarding their manuscript was affected by a publication ethics breach, . The effect of blinding on review quality. Cite this article. Next, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and institution group (Table10) to detect any bias. Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. Press J to jump to the feed. 0000003952 00000 n So, in October 2018, we added a new option for you when you submit to select Springer Nature journals. editors waits for him to send his comments then they contact the author and make a decision on the basis of these reports and send you acceptance, rejection or revision based on their reports . As a consequence, we are unable to distinguish bias towards author characteristics or the review model from any quality effect, and thus, we cannot draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of DBPR in addressing bias. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. 0000003764 00000 n The prestige of the corresponding authors institutions was measured from the data of the Global Research Identifier Database (GRID) by dividing institutions in three prestige groups with reference to the 2016 Times Higher Education (THE) ranking. More information regarding the approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. To ascertain whether indeed any referee bias is present, we studied the acceptance rate by gender and review type. This is because authors cannot modify their choice of review model at the transfer stage, and thus transfers cannot contribute to the uptake analysis. 'Completed - Accept'. . We discuss the limitations of the study in more detail in the Discussion section. 0000005880 00000 n For the sake of completeness, Table8 includes the number and percentages of rejected vs. out-to-review manuscripts for which the gender of the corresponding author was male, female, or NA. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. . Yes (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The 5-year journal Impact Factor, available from 2007 onward, is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year. decision sent to author nature communications - tCubed Also, because of the retrospective nature of this study, we could not conduct controlled experiments. When a manuscript is re-ferred, all reviews and recommendations are sent with the manuscript to the receiving journal. The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. The multivariate regression analyses we performed led to uninformative models that did not fit the data well when the response was author uptake, out-to-review decision, or acceptance decision, and the predictors were review type, author gender, author institution, author country, and journal tier. For this analysis, we included direct submissions as well as transferred manuscripts, because the editorial criteria vary by journal and a manuscript rejected by one journal and transferred to another may then be sent out to review. How masked is the masked peer review of abstracts submitted to international medical conferences? The meaning of 'reject & resubmit' is to indicate that in principle the editor likes the topic for their journal, but the current paper is . Submission to first post-review decision: for manuscripts that are sent to external reviewers, the median time (in days) taken from when a submission is received to when an editorial decision post-review is sent to the authors. The original authors are given 10 days to respond. The height of the rectangles is related to the significance and the width to the amount of data that support the result. decision sent to author nature communications posted by Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. Click here to download our quick reference guide to journal metrics. We can conclude that authors from the least prestigious institutions are more likely to choose DBPR compared to authors from the most prestigious institutions and authors from the mid-range institutions. EDR is employed by Macmillan Publishers Ltd, which publishes the Nature-branded journals. Because we were unable to independently measure the quality of the manuscripts, this quality-dependent selection, if present, remains undetermined in our study. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. Renee Wever. isolera golv plintgrund waiting to send decision to author nature. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Table14 shows acceptance rate by institution group, regardless of review type. . Editorial contacts can be found by clicking on the "Help & support" button under the "For Authors" section of the journal's homepage as listed on SpringerLink. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. This means that there is a statistically significant difference between the three groups. You can see an example in the article above. how to pronounce dandelion witcher. . Roberts SG, Verhoef T. Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Springer Nature but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. a higher likelihood for rejection) for double-blind than single-blind papers (p value <0.001, df=1, Cramers V=0.112 for first decision; p value <0.001; df=1, Cramers V=0.082 for post-review decision). Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, In general, authors from countries with a more recent history of academic excellence are more likely to choose DBPR. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development. Helmer M, Schottdorf M, Neef A, Battaglia D. Research: gender bias in scholarly peer review. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit Since the models showed a bad fit to the data according to accepted diagnostics criteria, further interpretation of the models is not warranted. 9 days How many days did the entire process take? When analysing uptake data by journal tier, we have included both direct submissions and transfers incoming to each journal group, for a total of 128,457 manuscripts that were submitted to one of the 25 Nature-branded journals. Carlsson F, Lfgren , Sterner T. Discrimination in scientific review: a natural field experiment on blind versus non-blind reviews. Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, Hong Y, Grant AO, Daniels SR, Krumholz HM. We considered using citations as a proxy for the quality of published papers; however, this would have limited the dataset to the small number of published articles that have had time to accrue citations, given the low acceptance rate of the journals considered, and the fact that the dataset is recent in relation to when DBPR was introduced at the Nature journals. Accessed 15 Jan 2017. 0000013573 00000 n Which proportions of papers are sent out to review under SBPR and DBPR? Finally, we investigated the uptake of the peer review models by country of the corresponding author for the entire portfolio, using data on all of the 106,373 manuscripts. Which proportions of papers are accepted for publication under SBPR and DBPR? Data are collected annually for full calendar years. 0000004498 00000 n and JavaScript. Cohen-Friendly association plot for Table5. The author can request that the deadline be extended by writing to the editor in advance. This result does not change significantly if we focus on the three institution groups we defined (high-, medium-, and low-prestige), thus excluding the fourth group for which no THE rank was found (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.405, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.064), which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. The results of a likelihood ratio showed that the more complex model is better than the simpler ones, and its pseudo R2 is the highest (though very low). That is, authors that feel more vulnerable to implicit bias against the prestige of their institutional affiliation or their country tend to choose DBPR to prevent such bias playing a role in the editorial decision. All coauthors must agree to post a preprint and participate inIn Review. 2016;1(2):1637. Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. Research Integrity and Peer Review https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x. The WeWork Decision. Journal Metrics | Nature Communications Posted on 31st May 2022 by 31st May 2022 by Make the correction notice free to view. Nature. For most of our journals the corresponding author can track the article online. These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. 0000002247 00000 n We found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. We also attempted to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model with a random effect for the country category, as we can assume that the data is sampled by country and observations from the same country share characteristics and are not independent. If you need any assistance please contact us at Author Support, or contact the responsible editor for the journal. A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can Manuscript # . Papers from more prestigious institutions are more likely to be sent to review than papers from less prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. 0000001795 00000 n Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. The binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. We excluded data where the gender was not assigned to either male or female. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. 0000065294 00000 n Cookies policy. Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. As needed, the journal editors may also ask the committee to provide opinions on the policies and procedures of the journals. Toggle navigation. The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.05, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. 0000082326 00000 n You will receive more information via email from the production team regarding the publication process. Did you find it helpful? Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable . In order to see if institutional prestige played a role in the choice of review type by authors, we analysed the uptake by institution group for the entire portfolio. Our commitment to early sharing andtransparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. The UC's agreement with Springer Nature is a three-year-plus agreement, through 2023, that increases both UC's access to Springer Nature journals and support for the open access publication of UC research. In order to see whether the OTR outcome could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. Barbara McGillivray. Sodexo Disney Springs, (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Article Influence Score determines the average influence of a journal's articles over the first five years after publication. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. This first-of-its-kindoption, called In Review, brought to you by our partners at Research Square, makes it easy to share a preprint of your manuscript on the Research Square platform andgives you real time updates onyour manuscripts progress through peer review. If that article is rejected, the journal name and public peer review timeline will be removed but the preprint and any versions of it, if any, will remain public. . In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. At Nature Biomedical Engineering, we collect some numbers into a 'journal dashboard': These numbers are running statistics over 6-month intervals (to smooth out fluctuations in the numbers*). Is my manuscript likely to be peer reviewed by now? - Editage Insights We excluded papers for which the post-review outcome was a revision and papers which were still under review; thus, the dataset for this analysis comprises 20,706 records of which 8934 were accepted and 11,772 were rejected. We then studied the manuscripts editorial outcome in relation to review model and authors characteristics. For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. The corresponding author does not need to be the first author . Your script could be better than the image of the journal. Papers. Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17]. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. 0000004388 00000 n Table6 shows the counts and proportions of manuscripts that were sent out for review or rejected by the editors as a function of peer review model. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. This is because the Nature journals do not collect information on authors gender, and thus, such information can only be retrieved with name-matching algorithms with limited accuracy. References from one article in a journal to another article from the same journal are removed, so that Eigenfactor Scores are not influenced by journal self-citation. Internet Explorer). For other authors characteristics, such as institutional prestige, a quality factor is more likely than for gender: it is not unthinkable to assume that on average manuscripts from more prestigious institutions, which tend to have more resources, are of a higher quality than those from institutions with lower prestige and fewer means. The decision is sent to the author. We believe that Impact Factor is just one of a number of metrics that can be used to evaluate a journal, and a small number of highly cited papers can have a disproportionate effect on the mean number of citations per paper. Although each journal published by Cell Press is editorially independent, we have been using Editorial Manager, a manuscript tracking system that allows authors to transfer manuscripts along with any review comments they may have between Molecular Plant and Plant Communications.Should you have any questions about the . A 3D accelerometer device and host-board (i.e., sensor node) were embedded in a case . Nature. Similar results are achieved if simpler logistic regression models are considered, such as review type modelled on journal tier and institution and review type modelled on journal tier only. 0000062617 00000 n Once a paper is submitted, the journal editors proceed with their assessment of the work and decide whether each manuscript is sent out for review (OTR) to external reviewers. 0000055535 00000 n Perspect Psychol Sci. Includes a detailed report with feedback and, for journal manuscripts, publishing advice and journal recommendations based on our editors' detailed assessment of your findings. Terms and Conditions, We employed hypothesis testing techniques to test various hypotheses against the data. And here is a list of journals currently onIn Review. One reviewer admitted the specific field wasn't in his/hers expertise.